Search for: "Vitamin Energy, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:54 am
Schneiderman reportedly has issued subpoenas to Monster Beverage Corp., PepsiCo Inc., which makes the energy drink AMP, and Living Essentials LLC, the purveyor of 5-hour Energy. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:54 am
Schneiderman reportedly has issued subpoenas to Monster Beverage Corp., PepsiCo Inc., which makes the energy drink AMP, and Living Essentials LLC, the purveyor of 5-hour Energy. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Vitamin Energy, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC, 2008 WL 4492644 (S.D. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:20 am
Living Essentials, LLC, 2012 WL 2513489 (C.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 2:38 pm
Last Thursday, the Sixth Circuit resurrected a trademark infringement claim and a false advertising counterclaim involving the competing “energy shot” vitamin drinks “5-hour ENERGY™” offered by Innovation Ventures, LLC, d/b/a Living Essentials (“LE”) and “6 Hour POWER” from N.V.E., Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
.), and the makers of 5-hour Energy (Monster Beverage Corp. and Living Essentials LLC), as part of an recently launched investigation into whether the energy drink industry is deceiving consumers with false advertising concerning the ingredients and health benefits of its products. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
.), and the makers of 5-hour Energy (Monster Beverage Corp. and Living Essentials LLC), as part of an recently launched investigation into whether the energy drink industry is deceiving consumers with false advertising concerning the ingredients and health benefits of its products. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:07 am
Living Essentials, LLC, NO. 14-2-19684-9 (King County Super. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:42 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:47 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below, in view of the registered mark HORSEPOWER ENERGY DRINKS, both for energy drinks [ENERGY DRINKS disclaimed in the cited mark].In re Murad, Inc., Serial No. 86286112 (December 9, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:15 am
For example, “ ‘B-vitamins for energy,’ is not an inherently false representation, as the body does require B-vitamins in order to produce energy. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:03 pm
” Supplements containing BMPEA are sold for weight loss, enhanced energy, and to help with workouts. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
May 18, 2021 - 11 AM: In re BFY LLC, Serial No. 88606855 [Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark MULTEEZ for "Homeopathic pharmaceuticals, namely, vitamins," on the ground of mere descriptiveness.]May 25 2021 - 1 PM: In re Herman Miller, Inc., Serial No. 88027008 [Refusal to register a three-dimensional product configuration of a chair on the ground of de jure functionality under Section 2(e)(5).] [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Pom Wonderful, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:09 am
” Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:57 am
Perhaps vitamins? [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
This past week, several consumer, self-regulatory and regulatory actions made headlines: Regulatory Actions FTC Releases Newly Approved Energy Labeling Rules, Considering Other Changes The FTC has approved changes to the Energy Labeling Rule, which it says are designed to improve access to energy labels and the labeling for refrigerators, ceiling fans, central air conditioners and water heaters. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:27 pm
., LLC, Opposition No. 91169165 [Opposition to registration of the mark SWEDISH LUXURY for mattress, box springs, furniture, and related retail services ("SWEDISH" disclaimed), grounded on Section 2(d) [likelihood of confusion with the registered mark SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM for identical or related goods and services (SLEEP SYSTEM disclaimed)], and Section 2(e)(3) [primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive]].August 4, 2009 - 2 PM: In re World's Finest Chocolate, Inc.,… [read post]
